#131 SUNDAY EXCLUSIVE - Unraveling the Enigma of Deep Learning: How AI Behaves Beyond Our Understanding
Fresh & Hot curated AI happenings in one snack. Never miss a byte 🍔
This snack byte will take approx 4 minutes to consume.
AI BYTE # 📢: Unraveling the Enigma of Deep Learning: How AI Behaves Beyond Our Understanding
Two years ago, Yuri Burda and Harri Edwards, two researchers at the esteemed San Francisco-based firm OpenAI, embarked on an intriguing journey within the realm of AI.
Their quest? To unlock the secrets behind getting a language model to perform basic arithmetic.
Little did they know, their endeavor would lead them down a path of unexpected discoveries, challenging conventional wisdom and leaving the research community in awe.
Initially, their efforts were met with frustration. The models they tested showed signs of memorization but failed to tackle new arithmetic problems. However, a serendipitous turn of events occurred when some of their experiments ran far longer than intended.
Despite the extended duration, upon their return, Burda and Edwards were astounded to find that their persistence had paid off. They had successfully trained a language model to add two numbers together, albeit after a significantly longer training period than anticipated.
Intrigued by this phenomenon, Burda and Edwards joined forces with their colleagues to delve deeper into what they had stumbled upon. What they uncovered was astonishing: in certain cases, models appeared to fail at learning a task, only to suddenly grasp it as if a switch had been flicked—an occurrence they dubbed "grokking."
This departure from conventional deep learning mechanisms puzzled researchers and sparked widespread curiosity within the community.
"It’s really interesting," remarks Hattie Zhou, an AI researcher not involved in the study. "Can we ever be confident that models have stopped learning? Because maybe we just haven’t trained for long enough."
Indeed, grokking is just one of several perplexing phenomena confounding AI researchers. The emergence of large language models, such as GPT-4 and Gemini, has unveiled a realm of capabilities that defy traditional statistical principles. Despite their remarkable success, the mechanisms driving these models remain shrouded in mystery.
Mikhail Belkin, a computer scientist at the University of California, San Diego, aptly describes the situation: "Our theoretical analysis is so far off what these models can do. Like, why can they learn language? I think this is very mysterious."
The unpredictability of these models, coupled with their unprecedented capabilities, underscores a profound reality: despite our strides in AI, our understanding of its inner workings is woefully inadequate.
The crux of the matter lies in the concept of generalization—the ability of models to apply learned patterns to new, unseen data. While this phenomenon is fundamental to machine learning, the mechanisms governing it remain elusive. Large language models, in particular, exhibit a remarkable aptitude for generalization, transcending linguistic boundaries with ease.
"When I started studying AI, I was struck by the lack of understanding surrounding its capabilities," recalls Zhou. "It wasn’t clear why this process leads to models that are capable of doing these amazing things."
The rapid advancements in deep learning over the past decade have been characterized more by trial and error than by genuine comprehension. Researchers have adopted a pragmatic approach, incorporating various techniques and innovations without fully grasping their underlying mechanisms.
"People try this thing, that thing, all these tricks," remarks Belkin. "Some are important. Some are probably not."
However, the emergence of large models has exposed glaring inconsistencies with classical statistical principles. The phenomenon of "overfitting," whereby models become overly specialized to training data, defies expectations as models grow in size.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, large models often exhibit a "double descent" curve, where performance initially improves, worsens, and then improves again—a perplexing deviation from established norms.
Belkin posits a theory of "benign overfitting," suggesting that larger models may be better equipped to identify optimal patterns within data. However, the complexities of large language models, particularly those based on transformers, defy conventional explanations.
"There’s a lot of complexity inside transformers," acknowledges Belkin. "But that isn’t enough to explain everything that large language models can do."
Researchers are striving to unravel this enigma, employing various strategies to dissect the behavior of these models. Yet, despite their efforts, a comprehensive theory of deep learning remains elusive.
"We have better intuition now," concedes Daniel Hsu, a computer scientist at Columbia University. "But really explaining everything about why neural networks have this kind of unexpected behavior? We’re still far from doing that."
The pursuit of understanding extends beyond academic curiosity; it holds profound implications for the future of AI. Better theoretical insights could pave the way for safer, more efficient models, mitigating the risks associated with their unprecedented capabilities.
"We don’t know what capabilities GPT-5 will have until we train it and test it," warns Lauro Langosco. "It might be a medium-size problem right now, but it will become a really big problem in the future as models become more powerful."
In essence, the quest to comprehend the mysteries of deep learning represents one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time. As Boaz Barak eloquently states, "Intelligence is definitely up there as one of the great mysteries of our time."
Indeed, we stand at the precipice of a new era in AI—one characterized by tantalizing possibilities and profound uncertainties.
As researchers continue to grapple with the complexities of deep learning, one thing remains clear: the journey toward understanding is just beginning, and the road ahead is fraught with both discovery and revelation.