#199 IBM Open Sources Its AI Model - Granite. Headache for OpenAI?
Fresh & Hot curated AI happenings in one snack. Never miss a byte 🍔
This snack byte will take approx 6 minutes to consume.
When you think about high-stakes technological advancements, you might first imagine nuclear reactors or quantum computers.
But in today’s enterprise landscape, the cutting-edge battlefield is AI.
IBM, the tech giant with roots going back to the punch card, is making a big play with its Granite 3.0 AI model, and it's not just business as usual. With $2 billion already in GenAI revenue (yes, that’s right they are already at a run rate of $2 Billion), IBM is throwing down the gauntlet—open-sourcing its latest AI tech to reshape enterprise AI as we know it.
Let’s get one thing clear: open-sourcing AI is like handing out nuclear blueprints.
But why would IBM share its tech when competitors like Google, OpenAI, Microsoft, and Anthropic are locking their models behind vaults?
The answer lies in a simple yet powerful strategy: community building and accelerating adoption. By open-sourcing under the Apache 2.0 license, IBM lets enterprises modify, adapt, and scale Granite 3.0 to their needs without restrictive handcuffs.
Now, this isn’t IBM's first rodeo. They’ve learned that fostering a vibrant developer ecosystem can lead to rapid innovation. It’s much like when nuclear fission first went public—it spread knowledge and spurred a global race.
Similarly, IBM is sparking competition but from a position of strength. The company benefits from watching its own technology evolve in the hands of others, leading to faster feedback, new use cases, and massive adoption.
But How Does IBM Stack Up Against Competitors?
IBM’s approach with Granite 3.0 isn’t just about being friendly; it's a calculated play against competitors like Meta's LLaMA and Google’s Gemini AI.
Unlike LLaMA, which isn’t truly open-source and comes with legal and use-case restrictions, IBM is "squeaky clean" with its licensing. They’ve ensured Granite 3.0 is fully open and flexible, something enterprises looking for agility and low-risk adoption will find attractive.
Meta’s LLaMA may be popular, but its limitations make IBM’s approach more appealing for industries where IP ownership and data security are paramount. Google’s Gemini, on the other hand, is more of a behemoth built for the masses, but it’s tightly controlled, leaving enterprises wanting more flexibility.
IBM’s open-source approach strikes a middle ground: offering cutting-edge tech without the walled-garden restrictions that can choke innovation.
The Granite 3.0 Arsenal: What’s Under the Hood?
IBM isn't skimping on the hardware (or, in this case, software). Granite 3.0 introduces a series of general-purpose and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, including Granite 3.0 2B and 8B, optimized for various enterprise applications such as customer service, cybersecurity, and IT automation. Think of it as a nuclear power plant you can customize to meet the energy needs of any city—big or small.
The models were trained on 12 trillion tokens of data, spanning multiple languages and coding frameworks. It’s the data that makes Granite 3.0 stand out, and IBM has made sure to emphasize their unique advantage—proprietary datasets collected through years of operations in enterprise environments.
In other words, IBM’s data isn’t your run-of-the-mill internet-scraped junk. This is high-quality, well-curated material, akin to uranium processed for maximum energy output.
IBM isn’t just focusing on raw power; they’ve built in safety protocols. With the Granite Guardian models, IBM is addressing one of the biggest concerns in AI: jailbreaks and harmful content. It’s one thing to build a powerful AI model, but another to ensure it doesn't run rogue.
IBM’s Advantage: Data, Expertise, and Scale
IBM's secret weapon lies in its data pipeline and its ability to be its first customer. By using its own tech across industries—from banking to healthcare to aerospace—IBM can fine-tune Granite 3.0 like a pilot perfecting a new aircraft. And with safety measures like the Guardian models, they’re making sure that enterprises get the best of AI without the baggage.
According to Dario Gil, Senior VP at IBM, the models outperform competitors like Google and Anthropic in key performance benchmarks. This is a bold claim, but with the combination of proprietary datasets, safety layers, and scalable architectures, Granite 3.0 is a formidable player in the AI race.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: The Tectonic Shift
Open-sourcing AI isn’t just a marketing tactic. It's the nuclear fusion of the tech world—immense energy without the dangerous fallout. With the Apache 2.0 license, enterprises can build custom solutions on top of IBM’s Granite models without fear of legal complications. This gives them a strategic advantage over other companies, which often restrict model usage through convoluted licensing agreements.
Meta’s LLaMA and Google’s Gemini may still dominate public perception, but IBM’s open-source model is a direct challenge. Enterprises now have a powerful, scalable alternative that they can mold to their unique needs—without paying exorbitant fees or being locked into proprietary ecosystems.
While everyone is talking about Gen AI, IBM is already thinking ahead to “generative computing,” a paradigm where AI models generate entire applications or workflows based on simple prompts. This approach shifts how enterprises use AI, allowing them to "program by example" instead of coding line-by-line.
IBM sees this as the next wave, and they’re already positioning themselves as the leaders in this space. Granite 3.0 isn’t just another AI model—it’s the foundation for a new type of computing that will likely revolutionize how industries work.
So, where does this leave IBM’s competitors? Meta, Google, and Anthropic need to re-evaluate their strategies. While IBM is open-sourcing Granite 3.0, its rivals are still playing defense, guarding their models behind high walls. But as more enterprises look for flexibility, safety, and innovation, those walls might start to crumble.
To survive this competitive onslaught, companies like Meta, OpenAI and Google will need to embrace more transparency or risk losing market share to IBM’s growing open-source ecosystem. They could also ramp up efforts in safety and specialization, doubling down on unique use cases where IBM has yet to dominate.
How Does IBM’s Open-Source AI Move Impact OpenAI?
IBM's decision to open-source its Granite 3.0 AI models under the permissive Apache 2.0 license doesn't just shake up the enterprise AI landscape—it has significant implications for one of the biggest players in the field: OpenAI.
As the dominant force in generative AI, OpenAI’s ChatGPT has captured much of the public imagination and enterprise attention.
However, IBM’s new approach threatens to alter the competitive dynamics in ways that OpenAI will have to address, particularly in the enterprise market.
For OpenAI to stay ahead, it may need to adopt more transparent and customizable approaches or risk losing enterprise customers to IBM’s more flexible and cost-efficient models. Additionally, OpenAI will have to address concerns around data ownership, safety, and scalability if it wants to maintain its dominance in the ever-growing enterprise AI space.
In this unfolding AI race, OpenAI and IBM represent two contrasting philosophies: one closed and controlled, the other open and collaborative.
As in the uptake of any technology - the customer always has the last word.