US May Impose $1 Billion Fine On TSMC
Fresh & Hot curated AI happenings in one snack. Never miss a byte 🍔
This snack byte will take approx 4 minutes to consume.
In the intricate world of semiconductor geopolitics, few stories illustrate the complex interplay between technology, trade, and international relations better than the current predicament facing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).
The world's leading contract chipmaker now stands on the precipice of potentially facing a staggering $1 billion fine over allegations that its chips found their way into Huawei's advanced AI processors - a direct violation of US export controls.
The Tangled Web of Chips, Sanctions, and Geopolitical Chess
As someone who's tracked the semiconductor industry for over a decade, I can tell you that TSMC's current predicament represents more than just a regulatory infraction—it's a perfect storm of technological competition, economic security, and great power rivalry. The US Department of Commerce's investigation centers on TSMC's work for China-based Sophgo, whose designed chips allegedly matched those found in Huawei's Ascend 910B AI processor.
Now, if you've never disassembled an AI accelerator chip (and honestly, who among us hasn't spent a Saturday night doing exactly that?), let me explain the gravity of this situation. The Ascend 910B isn't just any processor—it's widely regarded as the most advanced mass-produced AI chip available from a Chinese company, providing domestic alternatives to industry leader Nvidia's products. In other words, it's exactly the type of technological advancement that US export controls were designed to prevent.
According to Lennart Heim, a researcher at RAND's Technology and Security Policy Centre, TSMC manufactured approximately 3 million chips matching Sophgo's design that likely ended up with Huawei. If there's one thing semiconductor executives hate more than yield problems, it's seeing their products end up in the hands of sanctioned entities—especially when those chips number in the millions.
To understand how we arrived at this critical juncture, we need to rewind a few years. The US-China tech rivalry didn't begin yesterday—it has been brewing for the better part of a decade.
In May 2019, the Trump administration placed Huawei on the Entity List, effectively banning US companies from selling technology to the Chinese telecommunications giant without explicit government approval. This move came amid accusations that Huawei posed national security threats due to its alleged ties to the Chinese government and military—claims that Huawei has consistently denied.
For TSMC, the initial restrictions posed a significant challenge but not an insurmountable one. Then came the August 2020 expansion of controls, requiring foreign companies using US technology to obtain licenses before selling certain chips to Huawei. This effectively cut off Huawei from TSMC's advanced manufacturing processes.
By 2022, the restrictions expanded further with the CHIPS Act and additional export controls targeting China's semiconductor industry. The Biden administration implemented comprehensive regulations in October 2022 aimed at preventing China from obtaining advanced chips and chip-making equipment, particularly those that could be used for AI applications.
The reality is that each successive wave of sanctions has made the semiconductor landscape more complex. As one industry veteran said at last year's SEMICON conference (over what was definitely not his fourth cup of coffee): "These days I spend more time with lawyers than with engineers."
The Technical Details: Following the Silicon Trail
Let's get technical for a moment. The investigation stems from Canadian research firm TechInsights' teardown of Huawei's 910B AI accelerator, which revealed a TSMC-manufactured die within the multi-chip system. For those unfamiliar with semiconductor jargon, a "die" is essentially the piece of semiconductor material on which an integrated circuit is fabricated.
Upon this discovery last autumn, TSMC suspended shipments to Sophgo, and by November, the Commerce Department ordered the chipmaker to halt shipments to China of 7-nanometer or more advanced chips that could be used in AI applications. By January 2024, Sophgo joined Huawei on the Commerce Department's restricted trade list, despite its October denial of any business relationship with Huawei.
The technical specifications matter tremendously here. Based on the design for AI applications, TSMC should have exercised greater caution before manufacturing chips for a China-headquartered company, given the obvious risk of diversion to restricted entities like Huawei. The architecture of the chip in question was specifically designed to accelerate machine learning workloads—precisely the type of technology that falls under enhanced scrutiny.
Economic Impact and Market Reactions
The financial implications of this investigation are already being felt. Shortly after the news broke, TSMC's US-traded shares erased a nearly 3% gain to trade slightly lower. The potential $1 billion-plus penalty represents a significant sum even for a company of TSMC's size, which reported revenue of approximately $72 billion in 2023.
More importantly, this comes at a particularly sensitive moment for US-Taiwan trade relations. Just last week, President Trump announced a 32% tariff on imports from Taiwan, though semiconductor products were notably excluded from these measures. However, Trump has indicated that his team is "looking at" potential levies on semiconductors—a statement that undoubtedly sent shivers down the spines of industry executives from Hsinchu to Silicon Valley.
In a move that now seems particularly well-timed (or desperately urgent, depending on your perspective), TSMC announced at the White House in March that it planned to make a fresh $100 billion investment in the United States, including the construction of five additional chip facilities in coming years. It's almost as if they sensed which way the geopolitical winds were blowing.
The potential fine against TSMC would represent a significant escalation in enforcement actions. To put this in perspective, the largest recent penalty for export control violations was the $300 million imposed on Seagate Technology Holdings in 2023 for shipping over $1.1 billion worth of hard disk drives to Huawei.
A billion-dollar fine would set a new precedent and signal the seriousness with which the current administration views export control violations. As US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick bluntly stated at a Washington conference last month:
"We are going to seek in this administration a dramatic increase in enforcement and fines for people who break the rules. We have had enough of people trying to make a dollar supporting the people who seek to destroy our way of life."
Similarly pointed comments came from Jeffrey Kessler, who was confirmed in March as Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security to oversee US export controls. At his February nomination hearing, Kessler specifically mentioned that reports of TSMC chips going to Huawei were "a huge concern" and that "strong enforcement" was critical.
The Geopolitical Chess Game and Taiwan's Precarious Position
It's impossible to discuss TSMC without acknowledging Taiwan's unique and precarious geopolitical position. The island is home to over 90% of the world's advanced semiconductor manufacturing capacity, making it both indispensable to the global economy and a potential flashpoint in US-China relations.
TSMC's importance to both the United States and China places Taiwan in an unenviable position—caught between two superpowers with competing interests. For Taiwan, maintaining its technological edge through companies like TSMC is not just an economic imperative but a strategic one.
As one Taiwanese official once remarked :
"TSMC is our Silicon Shield. The world needs our chips too much to let anything happen to us."
Recent events, however, suggest that this shield may not be as impenetrable as once thought.
TSMC's Response and Potential Paths Forward
TSMC, for its part, has maintained that it is committed to complying with all applicable laws. Company spokeswoman Nina Kao stated that TSMC has not supplied to Huawei since mid-September 2020 and that they are cooperating with the Commerce Department's investigation.
The typical process for export control violations involves the Commerce Department issuing a "proposed charging letter" that cites alleged violations, their value, and the formula for a civil penalty. The company then has 30 days to respond. While no public action has yet been taken against TSMC, the wheels of regulatory enforcement turn slowly but deliberately.
Looking ahead, TSMC faces several possible scenarios. The company could contest the findings, negotiate a settlement (likely involving significant penalties but potentially less than the reported $1 billion figure), or accept the full penalty while implementing enhanced compliance measures.
Regardless of the outcome, this case represents a watershed moment in the enforcement of semiconductor export controls and will likely influence corporate behavior throughout the global chip supply chain. If TSMC—widely regarded as one of the most sophisticated and compliance-conscious companies in the industry—can find itself in this predicament, other firms may well be wondering: "Are we next?"
The TSMC investigation is not occurring in isolation but rather as part of a broader strategic competition for technological supremacy. The United States has made it clear that it views advanced semiconductor technology as critical to both economic prosperity and national security.
Meanwhile, China continues to invest heavily in its domestic semiconductor industry, with the goal of achieving greater self-sufficiency. Huawei's Ascend 910B represents a significant milestone in this journey, demonstrating China's growing capabilities in the AI chip space despite facing severe restrictions.
The irony isn't lost on industry observers: the very sanctions designed to impede China's technological advancement may be accelerating its drive toward self-sufficiency.
As one Chinese semiconductor executive told me last year at a conference,
"Every new restriction is just another problem for our engineers to solve."
Whether this problem-solving will ultimately lead to true technological independence remains to be seen, but the determination is unmistakable.
In this high-stakes game of technological chess, each move prompts a countermove. The potential penalty against TSMC represents just one piece on an increasingly crowded board, where the rules are constantly changing and the consequences of miscalculation grow more severe.
As we navigate this new era of techno-nationalism and semiconductor geopolitics, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the days of viewing the chip industry through a purely commercial lens are over.
Today's semiconductor decisions are tomorrow's geopolitical realities, and companies like TSMC find themselves not just at the cutting edge of technology but at the frontier of a new kind of global competition—one measured in nanometers but with implications that span continents.
For TSMC and the global semiconductor industry, the silicon road ahead may be etched with uncertainty, but its importance to our collective future has never been more certain.
About the author: Rupesh Bhambwani is a technology enthusiast specializing in the broad technology industry dynamics and international technology policy. When not obsessing over nanometer-scale transistors and staring at the stars, he can be found trying to explain to his relatives why their smartphones are actually miracles of modern engineering, usually to limited success.